Anchoring Effect
A random wheel-of-fortune spin changes your estimate of how many African nations are in the UN. The spin was meaningless. The effect was real. Why?
19746 min read
Domain
Where rational individuals produce irrational collective outcomes.
30 entriesFilter these further →
Ages 8+, no background needed.
A random wheel-of-fortune spin changes your estimate of how many African nations are in the UN. The spin was meaningless. The effect was real. Why?
19746 min read
A pattern that held for fifty years: every two years, computers got twice as powerful for the same price. What happens when it stops?
19657 min read
80% of results come from 20% of effort. 80% of bugs from 20% of code. Is this a law of nature, or a coincidence with a catchy ratio?
18966 min read
Give yourself a week for a task that takes an hour, and it will take a week. Why does work expand to fill available time?
19556 min read
You paid for a concert ticket and now feel terrible. If you hadn't paid, you'd stay home. You paid, so you go. Why does a sunk cost change anything?
19857 min read
Why does every organisation seem to be run by people who are bad at their jobs? Because the good ones got promoted until they weren't.
19696 min read
Two people can each do better by betraying the other — and end up worse off than if neither of them had.
195018 min read
Every major technology is overhyped on arrival and underestimated a decade later. Why does intuition fail in the same direction twice?
19776 min read
You find a fence in the middle of a field with no obvious purpose. Remove it? Chesterton says no — and the reason reveals something about reform.
19297 min read
The British paid a bounty for dead cobras to reduce the snake population. When it ended, the population was higher than before. What went wrong?
19008 min read
Add more people to a task and each person works harder, right? Experiments show the opposite. Why does individual effort fall as the team grows?
19136 min read
A majority prefers A to B, and B to C, and C to A. Every voter was honest and nobody made a mistake.
178517 min read
Curious teenagers and general adult readers.
The moment you measure something and start rewarding the number, the number stops telling you what it used to.
1975 (Goodhart's formulation), 1997 (Strathern's phrasing)14 min read
Put out twenty-four kinds of jam instead of six and fewer people buy any jam at all. More options, fewer decisions.
2004 (the book); 2000 (the jam study)19 min read
Every herder gains by putting one more animal on the shared field. The field is destroyed by people behaving reasonably.
196815 min read
A software project is six months late. You add more developers. Now it's eight months late. Why?
19756 min read
Two equally talented people start. One gets a small early advantage. Decades later, the gap is enormous. Where did the extra distance come from?
19688 min read
Double the users of a network and the value quadruples. This simple mathematics is why some networks become monopolies and others die empty.
19806 min read
You know exactly how many red balls there are, and nothing about how many are black. Does knowing more make a bet more attractive?
19617 min read
Build an engine that burns less coal and the country ends up burning more coal. This was noticed in 1865 and has not stopped.
186518 min read
Every family starts saving more. The economy ends up with less saving. How can everyone doing the right thing produce the wrong outcome?
19367 min read
Richer people are happier than poorer people. Yet a whole country getting richer does not seem to get happier.
197423 min read
Undergraduate level in the relevant field.
Add a new road to a congested city and every journey gets slower. Close the road again and the traffic speeds up.
196819 min read
The boxes are already filled. Does choosing one still change what is in them?
c. 1960 (posed), 1969 (published)10 min read
Offered the same improvement in odds twice, most people take it once and refuse it the second time. Both choices feel obviously right.
1952 (posed at the Paris colloquium), 1953 (published)22 min read
A coin-flipping game whose average winnings are infinite. How much of your own money would you actually pay to play?
1713 (posed by Nicolaus Bernoulli), 1738 (published by Daniel Bernoulli)19 min read
One envelope holds twice as much money as the other. The arithmetic says swap — then says swap back, forever.
1953 (Littlewood, crediting Schrödinger), 1989 (envelope form)19 min read
Some things sell more as the price goes up, and the people buying them are behaving perfectly sensibly.
1895 (Marshall's third edition); 2008 (first credible field evidence)18 min read
Computers arrived in every office through the 1970s and 80s. Measured productivity did not move for two decades.
1987 (Solow's remark), debate ongoing17 min read
Graduate level or specialist readers.
There is no fair way to turn what a group of people each want into what the group wants. This is not a complaint about politics. It is a theorem.
1950 (paper), 1951 (book), 1963 (corrected second edition)25 min read