Domain

Economics

Where rational individuals produce irrational collective outcomes.

30 entriesFilter these further →

Beginner

Ages 8+, no background needed.

PsychologyEffectFamousBeginner

Anchoring Effect

A random wheel-of-fortune spin changes your estimate of how many African nations are in the UN. The spin was meaningless. The effect was real. Why?

19746 min read

Computer ScienceLawFamousBeginner

Moore's Law

A pattern that held for fifty years: every two years, computers got twice as powerful for the same price. What happens when it stops?

19657 min read

EconomicsPrincipleFamousBeginner

Pareto Principle

80% of results come from 20% of effort. 80% of bugs from 20% of code. Is this a law of nature, or a coincidence with a catchy ratio?

18966 min read

PsychologyLawFamousBeginner

Parkinson's Law

Give yourself a week for a task that takes an hour, and it will take a week. Why does work expand to fill available time?

19556 min read

PsychologyFamousBeginner

Sunk Cost Fallacy

You paid for a concert ticket and now feel terrible. If you hadn't paid, you'd stay home. You paid, so you go. Why does a sunk cost change anything?

19857 min read

PsychologyPrincipleFamousBeginner

The Peter Principle

Why does every organisation seem to be run by people who are bad at their jobs? Because the good ones got promoted until they weren't.

19696 min read

EconomicsFamousBeginner

The Prisoner's Dilemma

Two people can each do better by betraying the other — and end up worse off than if neither of them had.

195018 min read

EconomicsLawBeginner

Amara's Law

Every major technology is overhyped on arrival and underestimated a decade later. Why does intuition fail in the same direction twice?

19776 min read

PhilosophyPrincipleBeginner

Chesterton's Fence

You find a fence in the middle of a field with no obvious purpose. Remove it? Chesterton says no — and the reason reveals something about reform.

19297 min read

EconomicsEffectBeginner

Cobra Effect

The British paid a bounty for dead cobras to reduce the snake population. When it ended, the population was higher than before. What went wrong?

19008 min read

PsychologyEffectBeginner

Ringelmann Effect

Add more people to a task and each person works harder, right? Experiments show the opposite. Why does individual effort fall as the team grows?

19136 min read

SocietyBeginner

The Condorcet Paradox

A majority prefers A to B, and B to C, and C to A. Every voter was honest and nobody made a mistake.

178517 min read

Intermediate

Curious teenagers and general adult readers.

EconomicsFamousIntermediate

Goodhart's Law

The moment you measure something and start rewarding the number, the number stops telling you what it used to.

1975 (Goodhart's formulation), 1997 (Strathern's phrasing)14 min read

PsychologyFamousIntermediate

The Paradox of Choice

Put out twenty-four kinds of jam instead of six and fewer people buy any jam at all. More options, fewer decisions.

2004 (the book); 2000 (the jam study)19 min read

EconomicsFamousIntermediate

The Tragedy of the Commons

Every herder gains by putting one more animal on the shared field. The field is destroyed by people behaving reasonably.

196815 min read

Computer ScienceLawIntermediate

Brooks's Law

A software project is six months late. You add more developers. Now it's eight months late. Why?

19756 min read

SocietyEffectIntermediate

Matthew Effect

Two equally talented people start. One gets a small early advantage. Decades later, the gap is enormous. Where did the extra distance come from?

19688 min read

Computer ScienceLawIntermediate

Metcalfe's Law

Double the users of a network and the value quadruples. This simple mathematics is why some networks become monopolies and others die empty.

19806 min read

EconomicsIntermediate

The Ellsberg Paradox

You know exactly how many red balls there are, and nothing about how many are black. Does knowing more make a bet more attractive?

19617 min read

EconomicsIntermediate

The Jevons Paradox

Build an engine that burns less coal and the country ends up burning more coal. This was noticed in 1865 and has not stopped.

186518 min read

EconomicsIntermediate

The Paradox of Thrift

Every family starts saving more. The economy ends up with less saving. How can everyone doing the right thing produce the wrong outcome?

19367 min read

EconomicsIntermediate

The Easterlin Paradox

Richer people are happier than poorer people. Yet a whole country getting richer does not seem to get happier.

197423 min read

Advanced

Undergraduate level in the relevant field.

EconomicsAdvanced

Braess's Paradox

Add a new road to a congested city and every journey gets slower. Close the road again and the traffic speeds up.

196819 min read

PhilosophyAdvanced

Newcomb's Problem

The boxes are already filled. Does choosing one still change what is in them?

c. 1960 (posed), 1969 (published)10 min read

EconomicsAdvanced

The Allais Paradox

Offered the same improvement in odds twice, most people take it once and refuse it the second time. Both choices feel obviously right.

1952 (posed at the Paris colloquium), 1953 (published)22 min read

EconomicsAdvanced

The St. Petersburg Paradox

A coin-flipping game whose average winnings are infinite. How much of your own money would you actually pay to play?

1713 (posed by Nicolaus Bernoulli), 1738 (published by Daniel Bernoulli)19 min read

ProbabilityAdvanced

The Two Envelopes Problem

One envelope holds twice as much money as the other. The arithmetic says swap — then says swap back, forever.

1953 (Littlewood, crediting Schrödinger), 1989 (envelope form)19 min read

EconomicsAdvanced

The Giffen Paradox

Some things sell more as the price goes up, and the people buying them are behaving perfectly sensibly.

1895 (Marshall's third edition); 2008 (first credible field evidence)18 min read

EconomicsAdvanced

The Productivity Paradox

Computers arrived in every office through the 1970s and 80s. Measured productivity did not move for two decades.

1987 (Solow's remark), debate ongoing17 min read

Expert

Graduate level or specialist readers.

EconomicsExpert

Arrow's Impossibility Theorem

There is no fair way to turn what a group of people each want into what the group wants. This is not a complaint about politics. It is a theorem.

1950 (paper), 1951 (book), 1963 (corrected second edition)25 min read

Other domains